4111c3acf1
- Add guides: quick-start, installation, configuration, grower, consumer, transport, vertical-farm - Add API references: REST, demand, vertical-farming - Add concepts: blockchain, seasonal-planning, carbon-footprint - Add architecture: data-flow, transport-tracking - Add vertical-farming: environmental-control, automation, integration - Add examples: seed-to-harvest, demand-driven-planting, vertical-farm-setup Completes Agent_5 documentation tasks from AGENT_REPORT.md
322 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
322 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
# Carbon Footprint Tracking
|
|
|
|
Understanding environmental impact measurement in LocalGreenChain.
|
|
|
|
## Why Track Carbon?
|
|
|
|
Food production accounts for 26% of global greenhouse gas emissions. By tracking carbon at every step, LocalGreenChain enables:
|
|
|
|
1. **Awareness** - Know the impact of your food
|
|
2. **Optimization** - Choose lower-carbon options
|
|
3. **Reduction** - Make data-driven improvements
|
|
4. **Comparison** - See savings vs conventional
|
|
|
|
## Carbon Sources in Agriculture
|
|
|
|
### Traditional Supply Chain
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
│ CONVENTIONAL FOOD CARBON FOOTPRINT │
|
|
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
│ │
|
|
│ Growing Transport Processing Retail Consumer │
|
|
│ ████████ ████████████ ████ ████ ████ │
|
|
│ 30% 50% 8% 7% 5% │
|
|
│ │
|
|
│ Total: 2.5 kg CO2 per kg produce (average) │
|
|
│ │
|
|
│ Key Contributors: │
|
|
│ - Fertilizer production and application │
|
|
│ - Long-distance trucking (refrigerated) │
|
|
│ - International shipping │
|
|
│ - Cold storage facilities │
|
|
│ - Last-mile delivery │
|
|
│ │
|
|
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### LocalGreenChain Model
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
│ LOCALGREENCHAIN CARBON FOOTPRINT │
|
|
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
│ │
|
|
│ Growing Transport Processing Direct │
|
|
│ ████ ██ █ (Consumer) │
|
|
│ 60% 25% 10% 5% │
|
|
│ │
|
|
│ Total: 0.3 kg CO2 per kg produce (average) │
|
|
│ │
|
|
│ Savings: 88% reduction vs conventional │
|
|
│ │
|
|
│ Why Lower: │
|
|
│ - Local production (short transport) │
|
|
│ - Organic/sustainable methods │
|
|
│ - No cold storage needed (fresh delivery) │
|
|
│ - Efficient vertical farming │
|
|
│ - Direct grower-consumer connection │
|
|
│ │
|
|
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Transport Carbon Factors
|
|
|
|
### By Transport Method
|
|
|
|
| Method | kg CO2 / km / kg | Notes |
|
|
|--------|------------------|-------|
|
|
| Walking | 0 | Zero emissions |
|
|
| Bicycle | 0 | Zero emissions |
|
|
| Electric Vehicle | 0.02 | Grid-dependent |
|
|
| Hybrid Vehicle | 0.08 | Partial electric |
|
|
| Gasoline Vehicle | 0.12 | Standard car |
|
|
| Diesel Truck | 0.15 | Delivery truck |
|
|
| Electric Truck | 0.03 | Large EV |
|
|
| Refrigerated Truck | 0.25 | Cooling adds load |
|
|
| Rail | 0.01 | Very efficient |
|
|
| Ship | 0.008 | Bulk efficiency |
|
|
| Air Freight | 0.50 | Highest impact |
|
|
| Drone | 0.01 | Short distance only |
|
|
|
|
### Calculation Formula
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
function calculateTransportCarbon(
|
|
method: TransportMethod,
|
|
distanceKm: number,
|
|
weightKg: number
|
|
): number {
|
|
const factor = CARBON_FACTORS[method];
|
|
return factor * distanceKm * weightKg;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Example: 20 kg tomatoes, 25 km by electric vehicle
|
|
const carbon = 0.02 * 25 * 20; // = 10 kg CO2
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Food Miles
|
|
|
|
### Definition
|
|
|
|
Food miles = total distance food travels from origin to consumer.
|
|
|
|
### Why It Matters
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
California Tomato to NYC:
|
|
├── Farm to packing: 20 miles
|
|
├── Packing to distribution: 50 miles
|
|
├── Distribution to cross-country truck: 10 miles
|
|
├── California to NYC: 2,800 miles
|
|
├── NYC distribution to store: 30 miles
|
|
├── Store to consumer: 5 miles
|
|
└── TOTAL: 2,915 miles
|
|
|
|
Local Brooklyn Tomato:
|
|
├── Farm to consumer: 12 miles
|
|
└── TOTAL: 12 miles
|
|
|
|
Savings: 99.6% reduction in food miles
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Distance Calculation
|
|
|
|
LocalGreenChain uses the Haversine formula:
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
function calculateDistance(
|
|
from: { lat: number; lon: number },
|
|
to: { lat: number; lon: number }
|
|
): number {
|
|
const R = 6371; // Earth's radius in km
|
|
|
|
const dLat = toRadians(to.lat - from.lat);
|
|
const dLon = toRadians(to.lon - from.lon);
|
|
|
|
const a = Math.sin(dLat/2) * Math.sin(dLat/2) +
|
|
Math.cos(toRadians(from.lat)) *
|
|
Math.cos(toRadians(to.lat)) *
|
|
Math.sin(dLon/2) * Math.sin(dLon/2);
|
|
|
|
const c = 2 * Math.atan2(Math.sqrt(a), Math.sqrt(1-a));
|
|
|
|
return R * c; // Distance in km
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Cumulative Tracking
|
|
|
|
### Per-Plant Journey
|
|
|
|
Every transport event adds to the total:
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
interface PlantJourney {
|
|
plantId: string;
|
|
events: TransportEvent[];
|
|
|
|
totalFoodMiles: number; // Sum of all distances
|
|
totalCarbonKg: number; // Sum of all emissions
|
|
|
|
// Breakdown
|
|
milesPerStage: {
|
|
seedAcquisition: number;
|
|
growing: number;
|
|
harvest: number;
|
|
distribution: number;
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Per-User Footprint
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
interface EnvironmentalImpact {
|
|
totalCarbonKg: number;
|
|
totalFoodMiles: number;
|
|
|
|
// Efficiency metrics
|
|
carbonPerKgProduce: number;
|
|
milesPerKgProduce: number;
|
|
|
|
// Breakdown by transport method
|
|
breakdownByMethod: {
|
|
[method: string]: {
|
|
distance: number;
|
|
carbon: number;
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// Comparison to conventional
|
|
comparisonToConventional: {
|
|
carbonSaved: number;
|
|
milesSaved: number;
|
|
percentageReduction: number;
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Conventional Comparison
|
|
|
|
### Baseline Assumptions
|
|
|
|
| Produce | Conventional (kg CO2/kg) | Local (kg CO2/kg) | Savings |
|
|
|---------|--------------------------|-------------------|---------|
|
|
| Tomatoes | 2.8 | 0.32 | 89% |
|
|
| Lettuce | 1.5 | 0.15 | 90% |
|
|
| Peppers | 2.2 | 0.28 | 87% |
|
|
| Basil | 1.8 | 0.18 | 90% |
|
|
| Strawberries | 2.0 | 0.25 | 88% |
|
|
|
|
### Calculation
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
function compareToConventional(
|
|
totalCarbonKg: number,
|
|
totalWeightKg: number
|
|
): Comparison {
|
|
// Conventional average: 2.5 kg CO2 per kg produce
|
|
// Conventional miles: 1,500 average
|
|
|
|
const conventionalCarbon = totalWeightKg * 2.5;
|
|
const conventionalMiles = totalWeightKg * 1500;
|
|
|
|
return {
|
|
carbonSaved: Math.max(0, conventionalCarbon - totalCarbonKg),
|
|
milesSaved: Math.max(0, conventionalMiles - totalFoodMiles),
|
|
percentageReduction: Math.round(
|
|
(1 - totalCarbonKg / conventionalCarbon) * 100
|
|
)
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Vertical Farming Impact
|
|
|
|
### Energy-Based Carbon
|
|
|
|
Vertical farms trade transport carbon for energy carbon:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Outdoor Growing: 0.2 kg CO2/kg (minimal energy)
|
|
+ Transport (1,500 mi): 2.3 kg CO2/kg
|
|
= Total: 2.5 kg CO2/kg
|
|
|
|
Vertical Farm: 0.25 kg CO2/kg (lighting/HVAC)
|
|
+ Transport (10 mi): 0.02 kg CO2/kg
|
|
= Total: 0.27 kg CO2/kg
|
|
|
|
Net Savings: 89%
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Factors Affecting VF Carbon
|
|
|
|
| Factor | Impact | Optimization |
|
|
|--------|--------|--------------|
|
|
| Grid carbon intensity | High | Renewable energy |
|
|
| LED efficiency | Medium | Latest technology |
|
|
| HVAC efficiency | Medium | Heat pumps |
|
|
| Insulation | Low | Building design |
|
|
|
|
## Reporting
|
|
|
|
### Environmental Impact Dashboard
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
|
│ YOUR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT │
|
|
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
|
|
│ │
|
|
│ This Month vs Conventional │
|
|
│ ──────────── ───────────────── │
|
|
│ Total Produce: 45 kg You Saved: │
|
|
│ Carbon: 8.5 kg CO2 □ 104 kg CO2 │
|
|
│ Food Miles: 245 km □ 67,255 food miles │
|
|
│ □ 93% reduction │
|
|
│ │
|
|
│ Breakdown by Transport Method │
|
|
│ ───────────────────────────── │
|
|
│ Electric Vehicle: ████████████████ 180 km (0.8 kg CO2) │
|
|
│ Walking: █████ 45 km (0 kg CO2) │
|
|
│ Bicycle: ██ 20 km (0 kg CO2) │
|
|
│ │
|
|
│ Your Ranking: Top 15% of consumers │
|
|
│ │
|
|
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Best Practices
|
|
|
|
### For Growers
|
|
|
|
1. **Local seed sources** - Reduce acquisition miles
|
|
2. **Clean transport** - Electric, bicycle, walk
|
|
3. **Batch deliveries** - Combine shipments
|
|
4. **Direct sales** - Skip distribution chain
|
|
5. **Renewable energy** - Solar for operations
|
|
|
|
### For Consumers
|
|
|
|
1. **Buy local** - Shorter supply chain
|
|
2. **Accept imperfect** - Reduces waste transport
|
|
3. **Plan purchases** - Fewer delivery trips
|
|
4. **Pick up when possible** - Zero delivery carbon
|
|
5. **Choose in-season** - No climate-controlled transport
|
|
|
|
### For System Operators
|
|
|
|
1. **Route optimization** - Minimize total distance
|
|
2. **Load optimization** - Full trucks, no empty returns
|
|
3. **Hub placement** - Strategic distribution points
|
|
4. **Electric fleet** - Transition to zero-emission
|
|
5. **Carbon tracking** - Continuous monitoring
|
|
|
|
## Future Improvements
|
|
|
|
- **Scope 3 emissions** - Full lifecycle analysis
|
|
- **Carbon offsetting** - Tree planting, etc.
|
|
- **Carbon credits** - Tradeable savings
|
|
- **Real-time tracking** - GPS + carbon calculation
|
|
- **AI optimization** - Minimize total footprint
|